S H A D H I N L A B

Loading

Book a Meeting

AWS Fargate vs Kubernetes: Best in 2025?

28 Jan 2025 Cloud Computing No Comments
fargate vs kubernetes

Container orchestration has become essential for modern application deployment, with AWS Fargate vs Kubernetes emerging as leading solutions. Did you know Gartner predicts that by 2024, more than 85% of organizations worldwide will adopt containerized applications in their operations? As businesses move towards containerized applications, choosing the right platform can significantly impact development efficiency and operational costs.

AWS Fargate and Kubernetes serve similar purposes but take different approaches to container management. Fargate offers a serverless experience where AWS handles infrastructure management, while Kubernetes provides more control and flexibility but requires more hands-on management. Understanding these differences is crucial for making an informed decision about which platform best suits your needs.

This article provides a detailed comparison of AWS fargate vs kubernetes, examining their features, pricing models, and use cases. We’ll help you understand when to choose Fargate’s simplified management approach versus Kubernetes’ extensive customization options, ensuring you make the right choice for your container orchestration needs.

What Is AWS Fargate?

AWS Fargate is a serverless compute engine that lets you run containers without managing servers. It works with Amazon ECS (Elastic Container Service) and EKS (Elastic Kubernetes Service) to handle infrastructure automatically. You only need to package your application in containers, specify CPU and memory requirements, and let Fargate handle everything else. 

It automatically provisions and scales the infrastructure needed to run your containers. With Fargate, you only pay for the resources you use, offering a cost-efficient and scalable solution for container orchestration.

Features of AWS Fargate

Here are the key features of Farget has discussed below: 

Serverless Architecture: AWS Fargate takes care of infrastructure management, including provisioning, scaling, and maintenance. Developers can focus on applications without worrying about servers.

Seamless ECS and EKS Integration: It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Service (ECS) and Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS). This allows you to deploy and manage containers across AWS services with minimal configuration.

Cost Efficiency: Fargate uses a pay-as-you-go model, ensuring you only pay for the resources consumed during container runtime.

Key Benefits of AWS Fargate

  • Simplified Operations: Removes the complexity of managing clusters or servers.
  • Scalability: Automatically scales containers based on workload demands.
  • Security: Provides workload isolation for enhanced security.
  • AWS Ecosystem Integration: Works effortlessly with other AWS services like CloudWatch and IAM.

What Is Kubernetes?

Kubernetes, also known as K8s is an open-source container orchestration platform that automates the deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications. It groups containers into logical units for easy management and discovery. Kubernetes can run anywhere – on-premises, public cloud, or hybrid environments. 

K8s handles container scheduling, load balancing, storage orchestration, and automatic container recovery. It supports diverse environments, including cloud, on-premises, and hybrid infrastructures, making it a versatile tool for modern DevOps.

Features of Kubernetes

Kubernetes is packed with powerful features that make managing containerized applications efficient and seamless. Let’s explore its standout functionalities.

Automated Deployment and Scaling: Kubernetes automates container deployment and ensures applications run reliably. It scales resources based on demand with Horizontal and Vertical Pod Autoscaling.

Load Balancing and Failover: Kubernetes ensures even distribution of traffic across containers and restarts failed ones automatically.

Portable and Open-Source: Kubernetes is cloud-agnostic and can run on any platform, from on-premises to multi-cloud environments.

Key Benefits of Kubernetes

  • Customizability: Supports extensive plugins for logging, monitoring, and networking.
  • Community Support: Backed by a large global community offering extensive resources and tools.
  • Flexibility: Allows complex configurations for advanced use cases.
  • Resilience: Automatically replaces failed containers and maintains application stability.

Relation Between AWS Fargate vs Kubernetes

AWS Fargate can work with Kubernetes through Amazon EKS (Elastic Kubernetes Service). Organizations can use Fargate as the compute engine for their Kubernetes clusters, combining Kubernetes’ orchestration capabilities with Fargate’s serverless infrastructure management.

Detailed Explanation:

Integration Framework

Fargate provides a serverless compute layer for Kubernetes workloads through Amazon EKS. This integration allows organizations to leverage both platforms’ strengths while minimizing infrastructure management overhead. When using EKS with Fargate, AWS manages the underlying infrastructure while Kubernetes handles container orchestration.

Simplified Cluster Management

Integrating AWS Fargate with Kubernetes unlocks significant benefits. It combines Kubernetes’ powerful orchestration capabilities with Fargate’s ease of use and scalability. Here’re the breakdown:

In traditional Kubernetes setups, managing nodes and clusters requires manual effort and expertise. With Fargate, Amazon handles this complexity. Kubernetes workloads are deployed on a serverless platform, removing the need to provision or scale the underlying infrastructure.

Operational Dynamics

  • Fargate acts as the compute engine, managing server provisioning and scaling
  • Kubernetes handles container scheduling, deployment, and application lifecycle
  • EKS serves as the bridge between Fargate and Kubernetes, ensuring seamless operation

Key Advantages of Integration

Infrastructure Management

The combination eliminates the need to manage EC2 instances while maintaining Kubernetes’ powerful orchestration capabilities. Organizations can focus on application development rather than infrastructure maintenance.

Cost Optimization

This integration provides better resource utilization as Fargate automatically scales compute resources based on actual demand, while Kubernetes efficiently manages container placement and scheduling.

Simplified Operations

Teams can use familiar Kubernetes tools and APIs while benefiting from Fargate’s automated infrastructure management. This reduces operational complexity while maintaining deployment flexibility.

Limitations

It’s important to note that this integration is specific to Amazon EKS. Organizations requiring multi-cloud or on-premises deployments may need to consider alternative approaches, as Fargate is exclusively available within the AWS ecosystem.

AWS Fargate Vs Kubernetes: Comparison

AWS fargate vs kubernetes take different approaches to container management. Fargate offers serverless simplicity with automated infrastructure management, while Kubernetes provides greater control and flexibility. Their differences span across infrastructure control, pricing models, deployment options, and management complexity.

 

Feature AWS Fargate Kubernetes
Infrastructure Management Fully managed and serverless; AWS handles provisioning and scaling. Requires manual setup and management of clusters and nodes.
Workload Types Supports containerized applications only. Supports both containers and virtual machines.
Supported Environments Limited to ECS and EKS within the AWS cloud ecosystem. Cloud-agnostic; supports on-premises, public, private, and hybrid clouds.
Logging and Monitoring Native integration with AWS tools like CloudWatch and CloudTrail. Requires third-party tools like Prometheus, Grafana, or ELK Stack.
Infrastructure Control and Access No direct access to nodes; entirely managed by AWS. Full access to host nodes for greater control and customization.
Platform Dependency Proprietary to AWS; tied to its ecosystem with potential vendor lock-in. Open-source and platform-independent; supports various cloud providers.
Licensing Model Proprietary service provided by AWS. Open-source with some distributions offering proprietary add-ons.
Pricing Model Pay-as-you-go based on actual resource consumption. Variable; depends on hosting provider, configuration, and resource usage.

 

Infrastructure Management and Control

AWS Fargate handles all infrastructure management automatically. Users simply specify their container requirements, and Fargate manages everything else. This approach significantly reduces operational overhead but limits infrastructure control.

Kubernetes, conversely, gives users complete control over their infrastructure. Organizations can manage every aspect of their container environment, from node configuration to networking policies. This flexibility comes with increased management responsibility.

Verdict: Fargate is better for serverless setups, while Kubernetes suits projects needing direct infrastructure control.

Deployment and Scaling Capabilities

Fargate: The platform automatically handles deployment and scaling operations. It provisions resources based on container requirements and scales them according to demand. This automation simplifies operations but offers fewer customization options for deployment strategies.

Kubernetes: Users gain access to sophisticated deployment capabilities, including rolling updates, blue-green deployments, and canary releases. Kubernetes offers fine-grained control over scaling policies and resource allocation, though this requires more configuration and management effort.

Verdict: Fargate excels in ease of scaling, while Kubernetes offers advanced scalability for tailored needs.

Cost Structure and Resource Optimization

Fargate implements a pay-as-you-go model where users only pay for consumed resources. This pricing structure eliminates the need to pay for idle capacity but may result in higher costs for steady-state workloads.

Kubernetes allows organizations to optimize costs through direct infrastructure management. Users can choose their preferred infrastructure providers and implement custom resource optimization strategies, potentially reducing costs for well-planned deployments.

Verdict: Fargate is cost-effective for simpler setups, while Kubernetes can be optimized for large-scale deployments.

Platform Independence and Vendor Lock-in

Fargate:

  • Limited to AWS ecosystem
  • Tight integration with AWS services
  • Simplified AWS-specific tooling
  • Potential vendor lock-in concerns

Kubernetes:

  • Platform-agnostic deployment options
  • Runs on any cloud or on-premises
  • Standardized container orchestration
  • Greater flexibility for multi-cloud strategies

Workload Types

AWS Fargate: Fargate is optimized for containerized applications but doesn’t support virtual machine workloads.

Kubernetes: Kubernetes manages both containerized and virtual machine workloads, offering greater versatility for hybrid environments.

Verdict: Kubernetes supports more workload types, making it ideal for diverse environments.

Monitoring and Logging Capabilities

Fargate provides native integration with AWS monitoring tools like CloudWatch and CloudTrail. This integration offers straightforward monitoring but may limit options for third-party monitoring solutions.

Kubernetes supports a wide range of monitoring and logging solutions through its extensive ecosystem. Organizations can implement their preferred monitoring stack, though this requires additional setup and configuration.

Verdict: Fargate offers integrated solutions, while Kubernetes provides flexibility in choosing tools.

Use Case Considerations

Fargate is ideal for:

  • Teams focusing on application development rather than infrastructure
  • Organizations already committed to AWS
  • Projects requiring quick deployment with minimal operational overhead
  • Smaller teams with limited DevOps resources

Kubernetes is better suited for:

  • Organizations requiring maximum control and customization
  • Multi-cloud or hybrid cloud deployments
  • Complex applications with specific infrastructure requirements
  • Teams with strong DevOps capabilities

Learning Curve and Expertise Required

Fargate presents a gentler learning curve, focusing on application deployment rather than infrastructure management. Teams can become productive quickly without extensive container orchestration knowledge.

Kubernetes demands significant expertise in container orchestration, networking, and infrastructure management. Organizations must invest in training or hire specialized talent to effectively manage Kubernetes clusters.

Verdict: Fargate is easier for beginners, while Kubernetes caters to advanced users.

Community and Ecosystem

AWS Fargate: Fargate’s ecosystem is smaller, and limited to AWS services. Its community support is growing but still smaller than Kubernetes.

Kubernetes: Kubernetes boasts a vast community and ecosystem. It is the standard for container orchestration, supported by a wide range of third-party tools and resources.

Verdict: Kubernetes leads with its extensive community and ecosystem.

This comparison emphasizes the key differences between AWS Fargate and Kubernetes while maintaining accessibility for readers seeking to understand their options for container orchestration. 

How To Monitor And Optimize Costs Of Containerized Applications In AWS?

Cost optimization for containerized applications in AWS requires monitoring resource usage, implementing efficient scaling policies, and choosing the right pricing model. Both Fargate and Kubernetes offer different approaches to cost management, with specific tools and strategies for each platform.

Detailed Guidance:

Resource Monitoring Strategies

For AWS Fargate: AWS CloudWatch provides comprehensive monitoring of container resource utilization. Track CPU and memory consumption to identify opportunities for right-sizing containers. Set up CloudWatch alerts for unusual spending patterns and resource utilization spikes.

For Kubernetes on AWS: Utilize Kubernetes’ built-in resource metrics alongside AWS Cost Explorer. Implement tools like Kubecost or CloudWatch Container Insights to gain deeper visibility into cluster costs. Monitor node utilization and pod resource requests versus actual usage.

Cost Optimization Techniques

Resource Allocation: Set appropriate CPU and memory limits for containers based on actual usage patterns. Implement auto-scaling policies that balance performance with cost efficiency. Right-size containers to avoid over-provisioning resources.

Pricing Optimization: Consider AWS Savings Plans for predictable workloads. Use Spot Instances with Kubernetes for non-critical workloads. Implement lifecycle policies to clean up unused resources automatically.

Optimize Storage Costs: Use tiered storage options like Amazon S3 Intelligent-Tiering for logs and backups. Reduce storage costs by archiving or deleting unused data.

Regular cost reviews and adjustments based on monitoring data help maintain optimal spending levels while ensuring application performance meets business requirements.

AWS Fargate Vs Kubernetes: How to Choose?

Understanding your workload requirements and technical needs can clarify whether AWS Fargate vs Kubernetes is better suited for your application. Fargate is ideal for organizations seeking simplicity and managed services, while Kubernetes is a better fit for teams needing complete control and platform independence.

Detailed Selection Guide:
Business Requirements Assessment

Consider Scale and Complexity Organizations with straightforward containerization needs often benefit from Fargate’s simplicity. The platform handles infrastructure management automatically, making it ideal for teams focused on application development. However, complex applications requiring specific infrastructure configurations may better suit Kubernetes’ flexibility.

Team Capabilities and Resources

Evaluate your team’s technical expertise and available resources. Fargate requires minimal container orchestration knowledge, making it suitable for smaller teams or those new to containerization. Kubernetes demands deeper technical expertise but offers greater control over the environment.

Project Complexity

Choose Fargate if your project is straightforward and doesn’t require extensive configuration. It’s ideal for teams that want to deploy applications quickly without managing servers.

Opt for Kubernetes for complex, large-scale projects needing intricate setups, such as hybrid cloud environments or multi-cluster architectures.

Vendor Lock-in Concerns

Fargate is tightly integrated with AWS, which might limit portability. Kubernetes, being open-source and cloud-agnostic, supports multi-cloud and on-premises deployments.

Cost Considerations

Analyze your budget structure and resource utilization patterns. Fargate’s pay-as-you-go model works well for variable workloads, while Kubernetes can be more cost-effective for steady-state applications when properly managed.

Choose AWS Fargate for simplicity, speed, and AWS-centric workloads. Go with Kubernetes for greater flexibility, control, and projects involving complex infrastructures. The decision should align with your application’s scale, technical needs, and long-term goals.

When to Use Fargate

Choose Fargate When:

  • Your team prefers focusing on application development
  • You need quick deployment with minimal infrastructure management
  • Your applications run effectively within AWS’s ecosystem
  • Infrastructure automation is a priority

When to Use Kubernetes

Choose Kubernetes When:

  • You require complete control over infrastructure
  • Your strategy includes multi-cloud or hybrid deployments
  • You have teams experienced in container orchestration
  • Custom configuration and extensive customization are necessary

This structured approach helps organizations make an informed decision.

FAQs

What is Fargate good for?
Fargate is ideal for serverless, containerized applications needing simplicity, automatic scaling, and no infrastructure management.

Is Kubernetes free in AWS?
Kubernetes itself is free, but AWS charges for EKS management and the underlying resources used by clusters.

Is Fargate the same as EC2?
No, Fargate is serverless, while EC2 requires manual provisioning and management of virtual machines.

Is Fargate in VPC?
Yes, AWS Fargate runs containers within your VPC, providing network isolation and control.

Does Fargate use Kubernetes?
Yes, Fargate integrates with Kubernetes through Amazon EKS, enabling serverless infrastructure for Kubernetes-managed workloads.

Final Words

AWS fargate vs kubernetes are powerful tools for container orchestration, each catering to different needs. Fargate excels in simplicity and serverless infrastructure, making it perfect for streamlined operations within the AWS ecosystem. Kubernetes, with its flexibility and advanced features, is ideal for complex projects requiring customization and control. 

Your decision should reflect workload complexity, team expertise, and long-term scalability goals. Both platforms have distinct strengths, offering robust solutions for deploying and managing containerized applications. 

By understanding their differences and aligning them with your requirements, you can leverage either solution to optimize performance and operational efficiency for modern containerized workloads.

Ashikul Islam

Ashikul Islam is an experienced HR Generalist specializing in recruitment, employee lifecycle management, performance management, and employee engagement, with additional expertise in Marketing lead generation, Content Writing, Designing and SEO.

Shadhin Lab LLC.229 West 36th Street, New York, NY 10018, USA.

Shadhin Technologies Ltd.Riajbag, Road-6, Rampura, Dhaka – 1219, Bangladesh.